Procurement risks are best understood as opportunities for something to go wrong or not happen as planned. Risks are essentially events that are uncertain in terms of their occurrence or impact on an organization's ability to achieve its goals and objectives. They also include events that have already happened but haven't had enough time to play out yet (known as "delayed consequences").
Risks are anything that can happen in an organization that will negatively affect its ability to achieve its goals or objectives—and there are many ways these risks can manifest themselves: late deliveries, quality issues, company reputation, litigation costs, and loss of revenue or even a client.
RL-021 Ver 1.0 (Jan 24)
Confidential & Proprietary | 2024 CBRE Inc.
What is Procurement Risk ?
Useful Links
Resource Library
Managing Procurement Risk
Resource Library
Page 1 of 2
The need to manage Risk
Present-day procurement has evolved and has changed from being just a cost-cutting process to a strategically significant one that directly impacts operational profit and processes.
Managing risks across the procurement process can help provide the following key benefits:
- Proper and responsible use of resources
- Enhanced service
- Improved supplier and client relationships
- Increased appetite for innovation
- Better customer service
- A data-driven culture that puts business-altering insights at your reach
Steps in the Management of Procurement Risk
- Conduct a comprehensive risk assessment to identify potential risks associated with the procurement contract. This can include risks related to supplier selection, contract terms, financial stability, market conditions, or regulatory compliance
- Assess the likelihood and potential impact of each identified risk. This can be done through techniques such as risk probability and impact analysis or qualitative and quantitative risk analysis
What are common procurement Risks ?
Improve
Data Analytics
Accelerate Digital Transformation
Reduce
Spend Cost
Manage & Mitigate Inflation
Reduce Procurement Risk
5
4
3
2
1
Poor Supplier relationship management
5
Poor Contract management
4
Supply Chain
disruptions
3
Poor or wrong Supplier selection
2
Inadequate Needs Analysis
1
- Having a clear understanding of the needs, when and why, and how we will source them
Document the reasons:
- who needs the goods or services ?
- how the goods or services will benefit the client ?
- when are the goods or services needed ?
- What are the geographical locations ?
- Follow a transparent and easily accessible evaluation method with a carefully audited process for review
- Ensure ESG considerations are included in the process
- Understand how ESG affects our business processe
- Embed ESG into all aspects of the contract
- Respond quickly to disruptions
- Gain a better understanding of our supply chain
- Get granular visibility across not just our Suppliers but all those upstream
- Map Supplier capabilities to determine the best way to fulfil supply needs
- Avoid poorly constructed contracts
- Regularly audit the contract and its management process for inefficiencies and subsequent failures
- Ensure Suppliers are met regularly
- Avoid escalating unless necessary, and learn to talk the relationship through its rough spots
- Some common Supplier relationship management flaws to look upon:
- Not understanding the Supplier's track record
- Communication problems or gaps
- Lack of transparency
- Failing to maintain relationship harmony
- Unfavorable contract terms
Inadequate Needs Analysis
Reduce Procurement Risk
Identify and Assess Risks
1
Inadequate Needs Analysis
Reduce Procurement Risk
Allocate Responsibilities
3
Inadequate Needs Analysis
Reduce Procurement Risk
Develop Risk Management Strategies
2
- Once risks are identified and assessed, develop strategies to mitigate or minimize these risks. This can involve various approaches such as risk avoidance, risk transfer, risk reduction, or risk acceptance
- Develop specific risk management plans for each identified risk, outlining the actions to be taken, responsibilities, and timelines. This could include drafting clear contract terms and conditions, setting performance metrics, or including penalty clauses
- Clearly define the responsibilities and obligations of each party involved in the contract. This includes the buyer, Supplier, and any third-party stakeholders
- Ensure roles and responsibilities for risk management are communicated and understood by all parties. This promotes accountability and ensures that each party knows their obligations in managing the identified risks
- Continuously monitor the progress of the contract and regularly review the effectiveness of risk management strategies. This involves tracking key performance indicators, conducting periodic audits, and reviewing supplier performance against agreed-upon metrics
- Implement a robust reporting mechanism to identify and escalate any emerging risks or issues promptly. This allows for timely action to be taken to mitigate or address the risks
Inadequate Needs Analysis
Reduce Procurement Risk
Monitor and Review
4
Inadequate Needs Analysis
Reduce Procurement Risk
Learn from Experience
6
Inadequate Needs Analysis
Reduce Procurement Risk
Take Corrective Actions
5
- In case of any identified risks or issues, take appropriate corrective actions. This may involve revising contract terms, renegotiating pricing or delivery schedules, or engaging in dispute resolution processes
- Escalate significant risks or issues to higher management or relevant stakeholders, if necessary, to ensure timely and effective resolution
- After the completion of the procurement contract, evaluate the overall risk management process. Identify lessons learned, best practices, and areas for improvement
- Document these lessons learned to enhance future risk management practices and inform decision-making for future procurement contracts
- Use feedback and insights gained from the evaluation to update risk management strategies and improve the effectiveness of risk management in future contracts
RL-021 Ver 1.0 (Jan 24)
Confidential & Proprietary | 2024 CBRE Inc.
Risk Probability Framework
Useful Links
Resource Library
Risk Matrix/Guides
Resource Library
Page 2 of 2
Probability
Impact
Very Low
Low
Medium
High
Very High
Very Low
Low
Medium
High
Very High
Probability versus Impact Matrix
Scoring Probability Matrix
Likelihood of
Occurrence
Description
of Score
Score Indicators
Very High
75% + chance of occurrence
Encountered very regularly (ie: daily/Weekly)
High
50-75% + chance of occurrence
Regular occurrence, circumstances appear every 3-6 months
Medium
25-50% + chance of occurrence
Occasional occurrence (ie;- every 1-2 years)
Low
10-25% + chance of occurrence
Likely to only occur every 3 or more years
Very Low
< 10% + chance of occurrence
Rarely happend or has never happeed before
Very Low
-
Very High
Very Low
-
High
Very Low
-
Medium
Very Low
-
Low
Very Low
Low
-
Very High
Low
-
High
Low
-
Medium
Low
Low
-
Very Low
Medium
-
Very High
Medium
-
High
Medium
Medium
-
Low
Medium
-
Very Low
High
-
Very High
High
High
-
Medium
High
-
Low
High
-
Very Low
High
Very High
-
High
Very High
-
Medium
Very High
-
Low
Very High
-
Very Low
Very Low
-
Very High
Very Low
-
High
Probability
Very Low
-
Medium
Impact
Very Low
-
Low
TOLERATE
Low
-
Very High
Low
-
High
Low
-
Medium
Low
Very Low
Low
-
Very Low
Low
Medium
-
Very High
Medium
Medium
-
High
High
Medium
Very High
Medium
-
Low
Very Low
Medium
-
Very Low
Low
High
-
Very High
Medium
High
High
High
-
Medium
Very High
High
-
Low
High
-
Very Low
High
Probability versus Impact Matrix
Very High
-
High
Very High
-
Medium
Very High
-
Low
Very High
-
Very Low
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
MEDIUM THREAT
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
LOW THREAT
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
MEDIUM THREAT
LOW THREAT
LOW THREAT
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
MEDIUM THREAT
MEDIUM THREAT
MEDIUM THREAT
REVIEW
(NEW STRATEGY)
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
REVIEW
(NEW STRATEGY)
REVIEW
(NEW STRATEGY)
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
TOLERATE
Low RISK to the business - Manage as part of normal operations and SLA's
Low Threat
Low RISK to the business - Manage as part of normal operations and SLA's/adjust KPi's as necessary
Medium Threat
Warning sign of poor performance or poorly crafted SLA/KPI's, Benchmark and amend SLA/KPI's
Change Management
Consider RFP- change out suppliers for improved operations. Benchmark costs and services
NEW STRATEGY
Review Business Strategy to align with Client outcomes, Conduct Benchmarking and full RFP process